Opposing rhetoric between the US and China at the Asian security forum

Avatar of Nick John By Nick John Dec4,2023 #Asian #China #Opposing
Opposing rhetoric between the US and China at the Asian security forum 0
Opposing rhetoric between the US and China at the Asian security forum 0

US Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter.

`China is out of step with international rules and norms that strengthen the Asia-Pacific’s security architecture and regional consensus on the use of diplomacy and opposition to bullying,` the ministry said.

America is resolute and coherent

World public opinion previously posed many scenarios about what would happen at Shangri-la this year.

As if to clearly indicate Washington’s position, Mr. Carter spoke in Hawaii a few days ago, implying that there will not be any changes in the operations of the Pacific Command and the Pacific Fleet.

More than two weeks ago, the US military also allowed a group of reporters and journalists from CNN to participate in a reconnaissance flight on the artificial islands China is building in the East Sea, where the country’s navy 8 times chased away US aircraft.

Experts evaluate this pre-emptive barrier strategy as a skillful move.

Without direct deterrence, the Pentagon boss affirmed that the US will continue to do its best and send the most modern military assets to Asia to maintain stability in the region.

`The United States and its allies and partners in the region will not give up their rights. Ultimately, turning a reef into an airstrip simply does not create sovereignty or allow any country to impose restrictions.`

Opposing rhetoric between the US and China at the Asian security forum

Satellite images show many Chinese ships dredging sand at Mischief Reef in Vietnam’s Truong Sa archipelago.

He also did not rule out the possibility that the US would send ships and aircraft within the 12 nautical mile zone around the artificial islands that China is building in the East Sea.

However, in order not to raise tensions too high, the US Secretary of Defense softened his speech by affirming that a stable Asia is a region in which `all advance together, all fight together.`

Commentators at the US Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) assessed that Mr. Carter’s speech clearly demonstrated the `resolute but reasonable` stance of the United States on the issue of East Sea security.

As if to further highlight the `resoluteness`, many US officials attending the conference also sent tough signals to China, saying that Washington would eventually have to use military measures to resolve the issue.

Senator John McCain, also attending the Shangri-la Dialogue, called on the US to act more decisively.

In addition to the United States, other countries with voices in the region also expressed their opposition.

China told me

Opposing rhetoric between the US and China at the Asian security forum

Admiral Sun Jianguo, deputy chief of general staff of the People’s Liberation Army of China.

Speaking before top defense officials in Asia, one day after Secretary of Defense Carter’s speech demanding that China immediately stop reclamation works in the South China Sea, Admiral Sun Jianguo,

`The situation in the East Sea is generally still stable,` Mr. Ton said.

He also argued that `in addition to meeting necessary defense needs, these facilities are more aimed at demonstrating China’s international responsibilities and obligations` such as rescue, rescue, and gas monitoring.

According to Diplomat, the tone of Mr. Ton’s speech was somewhat reserved and the content was still just a repetition of old Chinese arguments.

It is clear that the PLA Deputy Chief of General Staff came to the conference only to reread existing policies and not provide any new context or explanation for China’s highly skeptical actions, analyst Shannon

His explanation about artificial island construction projects in the East Sea was taken almost verbatim from previous Ministry of Foreign Affairs press conferences as well as other official statements.

According to Merriden Varrrall, head of the East Asia Program at the Lowy Institute for International Policy, the ambiguity in Mr. Ton’s speech and his passive response were not surprising, which is why it caused so much disappointment.

But this is not China’s primary goal when giving a speech at this year’s Shangri-la Dialogue.

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *